As a day-job, React-using person, I like to stay abreast of interesting React news. As such, I save a healthy amount of links. Allow me to dump out my latest pile. Most of this is about React but not all of it.
- The Plan for React 18 — A bunch of people from the React team put this post out giving us all a heads up of what’s coming. Alpha is out, beta is months away. I thought Cassidy’s article on it was the most clear about what we’re likely to care about.
- React Query — Looks like a pretty robust tool… “the missing data-fetching library for React.” Don’t know how I missed it as it even seems more popular than Apollo. I’ve been pretty happy with using Apollo (as a user, my biggest pain is unclear error reporting), and it seems like that’s probabably the right choice if you’re heavy into GraphQL, but React Query looks awfully nice with clear docs and nice DevTools.
- Data Fetching in Redux Made Easy With RTK Query — Matt Stobbs looks at RTK Query, which looks like yet another alternative to the Apollo / React Query stuff.
Take a look at the Redux store in an app you’re working on now. If it’s anything like mine, you’ll see a mix of data from the backend (which is behaving as a cache) and UI state (the data that isn’t persisted when the page reloads). These two types of data are treated as if they are the same, which ends up making both more complicated.
- Bringing JSX to Template Literals — People think of JSX as a React thing, which is kinda fair, but it’s really a separate thing that can be useful with other frameworks (certainly Preact and even Vue). We looked at how it can be fun with even no framework at all in a previous video. Andrea Giammarchi goes deep here and shows how it can work with the already nicely-ergnomic template literals.
- React Hooks: Compound Components — Shout out to Kent Dodds! We’ve started using this in our pattern library at CodePen. It’s been nice for keeping components a bit more consolidated rather than a sprawling tree of similarly-named sub components with hand-rolled state sharing.
“… but when you’re looking at code that is functionally identical, your determination should be based on humans—how humans consume code.”
- 0 Comment